Sign in
Resources

Mokka vs. ConverzAI

Comparison Last reviewed: 13 Feb 2026

A Quick Look at ConverzAI:

ConverzAI provides Voice-AI "Virtual Recruiters" aimed heavily at staffing firms. Their agents run 6–21 minute phone/email/text screenings, summarize results to the ATS, and market "setup in <5 days," with claims of faster placements and large-scale outreach.

The Mokka Difference:

  • Staffing vs. in-house depth: ConverzAI is optimized for staffing throughput and omnichannel outreach; Mokka is optimized for evidence quality and integrity analytics for in-house teams and agencies needing trustworthy screening inputs (not just speed).
  • Structured recruiter intake: Mokka begins with an explicit recruiter-verified rubric before any candidate engagement, making downstream scoring auditable and role-specific.
  • Pricing & lock-in: ConverzAI markets usage-style deployments "with no lock-ins." Mokka's predictable seat pricing encourages screening 100% of applicants without surprise volumes.

Key Questions to Consider:

  • For your roles, is the priority omnichannel outreach scale—or verifiable achievements and integrity analysis?
  • How are candidate summaries traced back to question-level evidence your managers can review?
  • What governance do you get (versioned rubrics, bias checks, audit trails) when regulators ask "how was this decision made?"

Continue your research

This comparison is part of our comprehensive guide to choosing an AI recruiting partner.

View complete guide →